
Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925)
Rudolf
Steiner, the founder of the spiritual movement known as Anthroposophy,
was born on 27th of February 1861 in the village of Kraljevec, which
was then in Hungary and now in Croatia. He had a brother and sister
and was the oldest of the three children born to Johann and Franziska
Steiner. His parents were Austrian and his father worked as a minor
official for the Southern Austrian Railway. His family lived a
financially stable existence, but meagre by most standards of the west
today.
Owing to his
father's place of work being transferred to different railway
stations, Steiner's early life was spent in different towns in the
eastern region of Austria: Mödling (near Vienna), Pottschach, Neudörfl,
Wiener-Neustadt and Inzerdorf (near Vienna).
His earliest education was intermittent and included some home tuition
from his father. He attended secondary school at the Realschule at
Wiener-Neustadt from 1872 to 1879 and passed his leaving examinations
with distinction.
Steiner was already perceptually aware of the spiritual realms in
childhood and even then was able to follow the human soul beyond
physical death. He was in no way dreamy but was intensely interested
in the phenomenal world, and strove even as a young adolescent to
establish a conscious bridge between the sense-perceptible world and
the living reality of the spiritual world through the sensitive
development of intellect. In addition to his school subjects at the
Realschule, he read widely, discovering Kantian philosophy as well as
that of Johann Friedrich Herbart. He studied literature, world
history, physics, self-instruction in mathematics, as well as more
practical subjects like bookbinding and stenography. He had acquired a
working knowledge of analytical geometry, trigonometry and also
differential and integral calculus long before he was taught these at
school. To this he later added self-instruction in Greek and Latin.
By the age of fifteen he was tutoring fellow students from his year as
well as those from lower years. The school faculty gladly passed this
function to him and he was thus able to help supplement the family's
meagre income. The experience of tutoring transformed his relationship
to knowledge. He describes in his autobiography how what he learnt in
school passed to him in a kind of dream state and that to teach others
he had to bring the relationship to one of full consciousness. His
experience of tutoring also raised his awareness of the difficulties
connected with human soul development and were germinal in the later
development of the anthroposophic educational system known as Waldorf
education.
In 1879 when his father was transferred to Inzerdorf, Steiner studied
at the Vienna Polytechnic (Technische Hochschule) with a view to
becoming a teacher at a Realschule. Along with taking classes he
continued to tutor to make a living and to help his family. His
principle subjects were mathematics, natural history and chemistry.
During this time he also studied more philosophy and attended
philosophy lectures at the University of Vienna. He even "re-wrote"
page by page Johann Gottlieb Fichte's Science of Knowledge in
his continuous attempt to reconcile the apparently disparate realities
of the sense-phenomenal world and the realm of living spirit, which he
had no doubt that the human ego was part of. He studied Kant, Traugot
Krug, C. F.Thilo, Schelling, Hegel, Robert Zimmerman, Ernst Haeckel,
Franz Brentano, and others.
During his first year at the Hochschule he attended lectures on German
literature given by Karl Julius Schröer which introduced him to the
works of Goethe and Schiller, and at this time he had his first
reading of Goethe's Faust. He also learnt public speaking from Schröer
during this period.
Though he had, of necessity, to pursue the study mathematics and
natural science for vocational reasons, his relationship to them would
be remote until he could establish within himself as direct
experience, the spiritual basis of knowledge and of the phenomenal
world itself.
He relates in
his autobiography:
"I felt duty-bound to seek for the truth through philosophy. It was my
task to study mathematics and natural science. I was convinced that I
should find no relation to these sciences unless their results could
be based upon a secure philosophical foundation. But to me the
spiritual world was an immediate reality. The spiritual individuality
of each person was revealed to me in complete clarity. Man's bodily
nature and his activity in the physical world are merely the
expression of his individuality. The latter unites itself with the
physical germ provided by the parents. When someone died I followed
him further on his journey into the spiritual world."
He adds the following anecdote:
"One time after the death of a former classmate, I wrote about this
side of my inner experiences to one of my teachers at the Realschule,
with whom I had retained a friendly relationship. He replied in an
unusually kind letter, but with not a single word did he refer to what
I had written about the dead schoolmate."
This was a common experience for Steiner. People did not want to
listen to this side of his experiences. As long as he spoke in terms
of physical perceptions, opinions, notions and beliefs, this was
acceptable. If he referred to conscious perceptual experiences of a
spiritual realm, they were not interested.
If on the other hand he was met with proponents of spiritualism
(mediumism or similar trance states), then it was he who wasn't
interested. "Then it was I who did not wish to listen. To approach the
spirit in this way was repellent to me." (See Steiner's lecture
series:
True and False Paths in Spiritual Investigation.)
During this period (1879 - 1882), Steiner pursued his philosophical
quest ever more intently while he maintained his regular coursework,
though the latter somewhat haphazardly owing to the amount of time
dedicated to his search as well as to his tutoring. Fortunately his
earlier self-training in mathematics paid off as he could miss some
lectures "without losing the thread." As he had enrolled in the
Hochschule on a scholarship, he had to pass a written test each year
to prove his accomplishment and this he managed to do.
It was during this time that through his exploration of this
discontinuity between the physical and spiritual worlds, he was able
to discover, or better, awaken the bridge within himself. It was
something that can only be arrived at through one's own active
experience in thought pursuing the nature of reality inclusive of
thought itself. (See
The Philosophy of Freedom.)
Habitually, man establishes an ordered relationship with the world and
himself through thought. He sees, muses, experiments (formally or
through everyday experience) and draws conclusions relevant to his
needs. But his thoughts are completely conditioned by his senses and
his senses are completely conditioned by his anatomy and physiology,
and therefore even his thoughts about anatomy and physiology are
conditioned by this circuitous route. In this sense, thinking is
chained to our physical-sensory make-up and can never convey a true or
objective reality about the world or ourselves. At most it can convey
definable relationships between our various sensory experiences and
out of this grows science and technology.
But thought can follow another course. Steiner became acutely aware
that in the study of pure mathematics, something is being undertaken
which is not conditioned by an unascertainable physiology and anatomy.
In mathematics we are directly observing the laws of quantitative
relationship, which we can then apply to our sensory world and find
that they also hold good for that world. These laws exist, and though
we have to have a functioning brain, nervous system, etc. to apprehend
them, they themselves are not the result of any physiological process.
They exist within their own right and apply as soundly in the
phenomenal world as they do within the realm of thought. This opened
the door for him to what he later called "sense-free thinking", a
faculty which must be developed (not necessarily through mathematics)
to raise ordinary consciousness to the level of active spiritual
perception.
Once thought has been emancipated from sensory phenomena the human
spirit is in a position to not just examine the world through thought
processes, but to examine thought as a phenomena itself. When this
stage is achieved, the human being is standing on a threshold, for
when thought, or thinking, is observed as a phenomena like other
phenomena, its aspect must necessarily change and the human being, for
the first time in human history, has begun to experience the spiritual
world with his higher faculties. (It is certainly acknowledged
that all human beings in the past, and still many in the present, were
able to experience supersensible phenomena, but these have been
through dulling the higher human cognitive faculties which have been
advancing now for many centuries. Steiner is a representative of the
path whereby these faculties are strengthened and liberated from the
senses rather than diminished for the sake of visions, messages,
states of rapture, etc.)
Steiner's association with Schröer, who was an inspired champion of
German literature and German folk-culture, brought him ever more into
contact with the works of Goethe. Goethe's writings and outlook
represented for Steiner a truer perception of the world than was
offered by natural materialistic science and Darwinism. Through
Goethe, Steiner received the stimulus he needed to develop further his
own insights gained from spiritual perception. Goethe's outlook and
whole tenor of soul resulted from his own spiritual insights which,
like Steiner's, were routed in actual spiritual perception, something
for which validity was, and still is, fundamentally denied in common
culture.
In 1883 at the age of 21, Steiner was invited to edit Goethe's
writings on natural science with introductions and explanatory notes
for an edition of Joseph Kürschner's Deutschen Nationalliteratur
(German National Literature). This experience put Steiner to the test
as he had never published before, apart from a few newspaper articles,
and he knew that he would be entering difficult ground if he were to
try to communicate Goethe's ideas in a way that made sense to the
usual ways of thinking and especially with the current enthusiasm for
the static concepts which are the stock-in-trade of all modern
scientific endeavour. Something completely foreign was going to have
to be communicated in an accessible way. Steiner felt with certainty
that the static framing of thoughts in schematic form which is used to
establish quantified relationships between inorganic forms and
processes (e.g. Force = Mass X Acceleration) is inconsistent with the
study of anything in the organic world. The processes in living nature
are so fundamentally different from those found in inorganic nature
that the very quality of thinking employed to understand them must be
consistent in some way to those living processes. Thoughts concerning
organic nature, to truly apprehend this nature, must grow out of each
other in a manner consistent with the growth and metamorphosis found
in organic nature. This notion makes little sense to current culture
as we view static-schematic thought as the only one that guarantees
objective reliability. According to Steiner such thinking is "too
weak" to fathom living nature.
What is
implicit in this approach is the idea that to understand anything
through thought, the type of thinking must be in some way consistent
with what is being thought about. A world where exact, static laws are
observed, the thoughts must be such as to convey that exactitude and
stability. The dynamics of nutrition, growth and reproduction will
never be understood by thinking which can only look for chemical
formulae or mathematical equations. To study nature using formative
thought processes in the manner Steiner suggests, leads to an
apprehension of what drives organic chemistry in its formative
development of plants, animals and humans. That this approach may
simply be seen as a type of subjective imagination, one the one hand,
and that it implies something over and above the crude forces of
chemistry in the formation of living organisms, on the other,
naturally makes it anathema to a materialistic scientific thinking.
Steiner's personal challenge in the task of editing Goethe's
scientific writings was to formulate for the world an approach to
knowledge which could elucidate Goethe's work, otherwise he must
remain somewhat incomprehensible and undervalued as a scientist. Out
of this struggle Steiner produced an epistemology (theory of
knowledge) for the Goethean approach to science which was published in
1886 as Theory of Knowledge Implicit in Goethe's World
Conception.
In the early 1880's, Steiner became a private tutor to a family of
four boys, three of whom he was to give preliminary instruction prior
to elementary school and then to coach them through secondary school.
The fourth was a backward hydrocephalic 10-year old with poor general
health, who had hardly mastered the rudiments of reading, writing and
arithmetic. He was considered to be physically and mentally abnormal
and it was doubtful whether he could be educated at all. Through
Steiner's examination of the whole human and his ability to see where
the difficulties lie not just in the physiological processes, but
through these processes as expressions of particular soul and
spiritual difficulties, he was able to design a program of therapy and
study for the boy. In two years he made up the deficiencies in his
elementary school studies and passed the grammar school entrance
examination. As part of his developmental progress, his health also
improved including the hydrocephalus. Steiner continued to work with
him through most of his general education, after which the young man
continued in study, eventually qualifying as a medical doctor.
This period of tutoring and care lasted six years and sowed the seeds
for the later development of a system of therapeutic education.
In 1889, Steiner was invited by the management committee of the
Goethe-and-Schiller Archives at Weimar in Germany to edit the
scientific writings of Goethe as part of a new comprehensive
re-edition of Goethe's works. He moved to Weimar in 1890 and worked
for the next 7 years there, publishing seven volumes of the edited
works along over 80 other works including his doctoral thesis and his
ground-breaking working on heightened conscious activity -
The Philosophy of Freedom.
In
1897, at the age of 36, he moved to Berlin. It was around this time
that a further development occurred in his own faculties through
enhanced forms of meditation which opened the spiritual world even
more for him. This convinced him that though ordinary thought and
experience is utterly reliant on mediation by the physical organism,
concrete spiritual experience can only occur when the human cognitive
faculties can begin to operate independently of the body and thus
enter a different realm by way of a different form of consciousness.
In
1899, he married Anna Eunike, whom he had known as a close friend for
several years in Weimar. It was in Anna's home that he had stayed,
virtually as a family member, during the Weimar period.
In
Berlin, Steiner purchased and co-edited a literary magazine,
Magazine für Literatur and in the evenings gave lecture
courses for the Worker's Educational Institute which was founded to
give educational courses for working class people in Berlin. Steiner
taught a variety of subjects form anatomy and physiology to public
speaking. His lecturing career began here and extended over the next
few years to other organisations. It was in 1902, that he first
publicly lectured on the subject that was to expand in scope and to
occupy the rest of his life as a teacher and lecturer. He spoke at the
Giordano-Bruno-Bund on the 8th on October 1902 on 'Monism and
Theosophy.' By April 1903 he had given twenty-seven public lectures on
theosophy. It was during this time that he first used the term
'Anthroposophy.'
By
the time of his first public lecture on Theosophy, he had already
given over 50 lectures on theosophical subject matter as a guest
speaker at the Theosophical Library between 1900 and 1902. Soon after
Steiner started these lectures to members of the Theosophical
movement, The German Branch of the Theosophical Society was founded
and Steiner was elected as Secretary General. It was also here that he
met Marie von Sivers who became his close friend and eventually his
second wife.
Steiner himself had gone through a fundamental re-orientation in the
1890's as a result of his own spiritual investigations. Up to this
time he showed no particular leanings toward Christianity or Christian
philosophy. His intellectual and spiritual development showed no
allegiance to any belief system, but worked toward what he termed as
'ethical individualism.' Fundamentally he followed the path which
aligns itself with the spirit of modern science which strives to
observe and understand without bias. This means that self-assessment
must be present in every observation and measures are taken to isolate
and remove unwitting elements of bias or 'inner adjustment' of
observed facts. Steiner's own self-training and inner integrity
insisted on this. It was in this strict spirit of such examination
that he was to experience as a spiritual fact the central importance
in human and world evolution, of the Deed of Christ. This was not
something he had expected, but having committed himself to a rigorous
pursuit of truth, he was led inevitably to a kind of 'Damascus'
experience. "This experience culminated in my standing spiritually in
the presence of the Mystery of Golgotha in a most profound and solemn
festival of knowledge."
Though Steiner had entered the stream of the Theosophical Society,
this conviction and elaboration of a Christ-centred spiritual
knowledge put him somewhat at odds with the movement's oriental
outlook. They preached a cosmology and a spiritual evolution which had
no such central point of reference such as Steiner describes in the
Being and historical event of Christ on earth. Steiner also described
the Christ event which occurred 2000 years ago as a unique event; that
what has been referred to historically as Christ's Second Coming, is
to be an experience that human beings will be able to experience as an
etheric event as a result of changes which are now beginning to occur
with the human etheric body. The Theosophical Society at the time were
engineering their own physical return of Jesus in the person of a boy
they were raising in India. Steiner publicly balked at the absurdity
of this and eventually the German Branch was 'ex-communicated'. As the
Indian boy grew older had the good sense to leave the Theosophists and
he eventually became known and respected in his own right. This is the
person known as Krishnamurti.
It
was from those who sensed the greater truth of Steiner's spiritual
examinations, and who stayed with him, that the Anthroposophical
movement was born.
Steiner continued to write and lecture on the spiritual organisation
of the human being; the evolutionary origins of the humanity and of
the earth; cosmology and cosmogeny, the role of Christ in human and
cosmic evolution, the hierarchies of Spiritual Beings; the Gospels;
the Old Testament; the ages of humanity; as well as art, drama,
eurythmy, education, sociology, history, science, agriculture,
medicine, architecture and many others. In all he delivered over
6,000 lectures and published dozens of books, all based on his direct
spiritual examinations of the matters under consideration.
He
also designed and supervised the construction of the Goetheanum, a
centre in Dornach, Switzerland, which was to be the operational centre
for the Anthroposophical Society. This had hardly been completed when
it was burnt by an arsonist on New Year's Eve of 1922/23. A second
Goetheanum was designed and built in its place, only being completed
after Steiner's death.
In
Autumn of 1924 at the age of 63, Steiner became ill with stomach
problems and had to stop his lecturing. By this time his output had
increased to over 400 lectures a year. He still wrote from his sickbed
when he was able to but eventually died on 30th of March 1925.
There has been some suspicion around the circumstances of his illness
and death, as to whether there was any wrongdoing. This was even the
case during the last months while he was alive. He tried to put an end
to this even from his bed by writing on a slate board, the underlying
reasons for his illness. He pointed out that he had been able to
determine his output from his own perspective but had not taken into
account the additional demands that were made on him by others. The
contents of this statement are still available in a letter he wrote to
Marie Steiner, which is included in
Correspondence and Documents 1901-1925.
The
legacy left by Rudolf Steiner is too large for any individual or even
any generation to fully grasp or evaluate. Each lecture course opens
the door to a vastness in understanding that the reader can then
pursue on his own terms. For those for whom the knowledge has real
value, it is not simply an accumulation of knowledge, of facts, but a
stimulus for the spirit and a form of nourishment for the soul. Of
course some might be tempted to turn some statement or other by
Steiner into some kind of dogma, but it was never intended by Steiner
in that way, but as a stimulus for one's own free thinking. In this
light, it is hoped that for those who can derive benefit from
Steiner's work, his lectures and written works will be available to
humanity for a long time to come.
Robert Lawrence
Skylark Books